Treating engineers as fungible assets destroys context. You might gain fresh eyes, but you lose the implicit knowledge of how systems actually break. Stewardship, staying with a system long-term, unlocks compounding returns that are impossible to achieve on a short rotation.

And

Some problems, however, only reveal their shape over long horizons.

And

When you have spent years delivering reliable tools, you earn the political capital to say “No” to the spotlight when it threatens the product.

Lots of good points about how Staff+ works differently outside of “product”.